avatar

XXXwolfstrikeXXX

Posts: 5,500 Member Since: 04/24/14


In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey.

Lead

04/16/17 3:14 AM

Tags : :

15collinsWeb-master768.jpg



I think there's only one way to interpret this "art"


the left have some fanciful idea that young women will be used to promote Socialism and fight against "capitalism"

when this photo was taken with people in the background wearing red, it was no accident






Quote    Reply   

#2 [url]

04/16/17 8:31 AM

XXXwolfstrikeXXX wrote:
15collinsWeb-master768.jpg



I think there's only one way to interpret this "art"


the left have some fanciful idea that young women will be used to promote Socialism and fight against "capitalism"

when this photo was taken with people in the background wearing red, it was no accident








Seems like actually knowing WHY the people in the background are wearing red would be important for your thesis. School colors? Headed to a Redskins/49ers/USC game? Members of a team? Was there a company picnic? ---------------- I understand FINDING significance in the red shirts, but unless you KNOW it was intentional, it is just your imagination talking. There are just too many other ways to explain it. -------------- It's just people passing a statue on the street. Sure, they are all wearing red. But we don't know WHY, and we don't know if the photo was taken for that reason.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

legalizecannabis

Posts: 3,237 Member Since:03/15/14

"One toke over the line"

http://oi60.tinypic.com/t98q3a.jpg

#3 [url]

04/16/17 9:00 AM

The man who sculpted the bull is going to turn it around so it faces away from the defiant little bitch. He is outraged.....that bull represents the fighting spirit and optimism that America embodies, and the little bitch craps all over that and turns it into something negative.

Only a God damn simpleton does not see the socialist nature of defying a optimistic capitalist symbol.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Stop The Madness

Posts: 1,953 Member Since:03/20/14

#4 [url]

04/16/17 9:07 AM

The statue of a defiant girl in front of the Wall Street bull is now wearing a series of 'pussy hats'

March 8, 2017

In honor of International Women's Day, people are placing pink, floppy "pussy hats" atop the head of the newly installed statue of a defiant little girl facing off against Wall Street's "Charging Bull."

On March 7, the world's third-largest asset manager, State Street Global Advisors, placed the statue in downtown Manhattan as part of its new campaign to pressure companies to add more women to their boards. The 50-inch bronze statue stands with hands on hips, eyes locked on the iconic bull.

A day later, women gathered for marches and protests around the world in celebration of International Women's Day. In the morning, crowds gathered around the fearless girl statue and placed their pussy hats — a symbol of solidarity that first popped up during the Women's March in January — on her head.


http://www.businessinsider.com/defiant-girl-statue-wears-pussy-hat-international-womens-day-2017-3

Standing in the Way of Big Goverment is Not Standing in the Way of Progress

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Ogami.sacredcowslaugh...

Posts: 7,363 Member Since:07/10/14

#5 [url]

04/16/17 9:26 AM

The placement of the girl statue against the Bull of Wall Street (which commemorates the 1987 crash, not male chauvinism) is an attack on the original artist's integrity, purpose, and artistic freedom. Did "The Scream" merit a response showing a happy person? Maybe Mona Lisa should be confronted with a transgender person because Lisa is using her vagina for bigotry. And so on.

There should be a statue with a girl standing up to the Clinton Foundation, of Hillary Clinton hiding behind her gender and using it as an excuse for criminal and treasonable activity. It's not sexism to question the donors to the Clinton Foundation, but that was her defense. She cashed in because she rode the coattails of a serial sexual abuser, why doesn't someone speak truth to power to her?

I guess the little girl doesn't represent Sarah Palin's girls, who were vilified and demonized by hate-crazed Democrats because their mother had the gall to be successful and not run as a Democrat.

Maybe the little girl represents all the girls abducted by Boko Haram and not freed by President Obama despite the pleas of his wife? Or maybe she's standing up for the women at Elizabeth Warren's office who are paid less than the men there!

Elizabeth Warren’s Female Staffers Made 71% of Male Staffers’ Salaries in 2016
BY: Brent Scher Follow @brentscher
April 4, 2017 4:58 am
The Washington Free Beacon

The gender pay gap in Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) office is nearly 10 percent wider than the national average, meaning women in the Massachusetts Democrat's office will have to wait longer than most women across the country to recognize Equal Pay Day.

Equal Pay Day, created two decades ago by the National Committee on Pay Equity, is scheduled by using the Census Bureau annual unadjusted gender pay gap to determine how far into the next year women would have to work to match annual earnings of men. Last year's figures, showing that women earned 79.6 percent of what men earned, put Equal Pay Day on Tuesday April 4, more than three months into the calendar year.

However, women working for Warren were paid just 71 cents for every dollar paid to men during the 2016 fiscal year, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The median annual earnings for women staffers, $52,750, was more than $20,000 less than the median annual earnings for men, $73,750, according to the analysis of publicly available Senate data.

When calculated using average salaries rather than median, the pay gap expands to just over $26,051, or about 31 percent.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/elizabeth-warrens-female-staffers-made-71-less-male-staffers-earnings-2016/

Quote    Reply   
avatar

XXXwolfstrikeXXX

Posts: 5,500 Member Since:04/24/14
In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey.

#6 [url]

04/16/17 11:22 AM


Seems like actually knowing WHY the people in the background are wearing red would be important for your thesis.


I learned several years ago that the media shows you additional information in the pictures they select

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Nacho.abouttime

Posts: 174 Member Since:10/29/16

#7 [url]

04/16/17 11:56 AM

Here's what they should do.  Erect a THIRD statue, between the little girl and the bull, but close to the bull.  Such that the new statue faces the little girl and receives all of the glare from the little girl.  That statue should be one of a left wing loony, say Hillary Clinton, and then swapped out monthly with a different/new left wing loony (Chuckie Schumer would be my choice for the 2nd month).

I wonder how long the new little girl statue would remain there!

Last Edited By: Nacho 04/16/17 12:59 PM. Edited 1 time.

Quote    Reply   

#9 [url]

04/16/17 1:13 PM

XXXwolfstrikeXXX wrote:


Seems like actually knowing WHY the people in the background are wearing red would be important for your thesis.


I learned several years ago that the media shows you additional information in the pictures ?they select



I learned several decades ago that people see what they want to see and it often has nothing to do with the facts. You are apparently accusing the media of bias. I'm accusing you of the same.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Stop The Madness

Posts: 1,953 Member Since:03/20/14

#10 [url]

04/16/17 3:34 PM

XXXwolfstrikeXXX wrote:
Seems like actually knowing WHY the people in the background are wearing red would be important for your thesis.

I learned several years ago that the media shows you additional information in the pictures they select




Like the ones that showed Obama with a halo?

Standing in the Way of Big Goverment is Not Standing in the Way of Progress

Quote    Reply   
avatar

XXXwolfstrikeXXX

Posts: 5,500 Member Since:04/24/14
In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey.

#11 [url]

04/16/17 5:27 PM

PlacidRebirth wrote:
XXXwolfstrikeXXX wrote:


Seems like actually knowing WHY the people in the background are wearing red would be important for your thesis.


I learned several years ago that the media shows you additional information in the pictures ?they select



I learned several decades ago that people see what they want to see and it often has nothing to do with the facts. You are apparently accusing the media of bias. I'm accusing you of the same.

i'm totally biased against the media and the left-wing

Quote    Reply   
Add Reply

Quick Reply

bbcode help